Raceless Attack!

A play on words similar to a "fair assumption"?
But I allude to articles of "attack" or "dreams" and an alternative to "collision" that may be baseless.

In one fell swoop I have ruffled a few feathers or reversed the spin. Key words in new context can flip-flop a lot but there is a big difference between a change, of course, and progress. Just look what two words and two commas do. Let alone will. Not to mention the differences between u and I and making it us. The difference really does hinge on "you" and what we read or read into life.

[Oh what a dream we unweave.* Oh what a web we must weave. But not the web the old addage implies, but the web that reality needs. The web that determines what we will be.]

* I was going to use "To parse or not to parse", but technically this is a step below a play on grammar and even beyond a play on words. Fittingly this revolves around what we can b and r and I swear there was no irony intended let alone planned.

More From the Other Washington

Governor Locke selected for Secretary of Commerce Baltimore Sun Tribune

Previously Sims selected Deputy Secretary of HUD
Northwest Progressive Institute
Not to mention: Seattle Police Chief Kerlikowske for Drug Czar

Speaking of Housing:
Housing Price Decline Accelerates
by Dean Baker Center for Economic and Policy Research
and Selections:E-Voting Security Fixes...
by John Turner ARS Technica
and other Similarities:
San Francisco Chronicle May Shut Down
by: Robert MacMillan and Janet Kornblum, Reuters
Seattle Post-Intelligencer to go Web only…or be shut down by Classified Intelligence?

And President Obama Getting Warmer by Robert Scheer Truthdig (Un-State of the Union)
Or Cooler? Freeing Up Resources...for More War by: Norman Solomon, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Or Unbounded? Beyond Scarcity: Reinventing Wealth in a Progressive World
by: Joe Brewer, t r u t h o u t | Perspective *

[This sampling is not fully read yet (nfry) but forms a web of sorts with orginal sources in italics for the prior link. ]

* The pieces from Cognitive Policy Works .[Kerbel/Brewer]. in Previous Post of sorts have been read and are recommended as bold updated reflects [also .Lakoff. ].

SkyNet

Hawking, Colbert, Ryan, Sterling, MIT, Piketty.
FAA, FCC, and ATF must regulate drones. It is not so much what capital can do without labor or machines can do with intellegence, but...
What business, government and people do separately.

*

[update of sorts.]
[[ Owe what a web ... ]]
That's the ticket.  The Ribble.  The Iron Knee, or I Ron Knee of labelism and to reads or not two Reids.  Have knot will travel. Knot 2 4 M that which I may not read so you may have to. 

No Bell

Lorry Yet [!]
Con Text [?]

Ding Ding Ding!

Resistance is fertile!

(b.s.)/links up-trick-L...
 Weak In Review?*
(a.), (.b.)* Way, Too Point Oh? 
Ring of Fire: Why Reid Opposed...TPP...FT
DaliyKos: ...time to fight...
Trigger Alert,
Owe What a Web...
Salon TF: Merit ahh cracy?
Economist's View
NYTimes Stiglitz: Mo Drama Obama ?

* (anomaly of blog search Al Gore Rhythm)
[ Leveling the World Stage?]

Oh, what a web...

we weave when first we misattribute. "sic"*

But here(see footnotes) is the tangle thanks to Thom Hartmann.**

*not to mention misquote or evolve
** more tangle (thanks to embedded hyperlinks)

[footnotes: Michael Hudson, Six Minutes, Democracy Now]

[More run off or tangle courtesy of "google"(and Ctrl Find)and Thom Hartmann caller.]

[Speaking timing*** and that was another thread, but spins off of Cato and Henry George, or is it Tucker "George Will" Carlson.]

*** apologies for deep or rather unexpressed and anachronistic footnotes and 4A.

[subset of sovereignty or tangle]

Oh what a web...

Thanks to TruthOut and Center for American Progress:

In-Terror-gate Radio
Chats? Hindering the war on terror.
U.S. Attorney-gate?
Hindering the pursuit of justice.
Terrorist Regime Change? Hindering the use of intelligence.
Course Corrections?Hindering the collection of intelligence.

Following the logic or more comments later.

The Real Scoop?

The Whichgate?
The Yellow Leaks from Canada?
["NAFTAgate" Began With Remark From Harper's Chief of Staff]

It reminds me of the "yellow cake" from Africa
but they are on the trail,
and ready to send in the Mounties.

It was a very difficult read, [added 3-7-08]

["He said someone from (Hillary) Clinton's campaign is telling the embassy to take it with a grain of salt. . . That someone called us and told us not to worry."

Government officials did not deny the conversation took place.

They said that Mr. Brodie sought to allay concerns about the impact of Mr. Obama and Ms. Clinton's assertion that they would re-negotiate NAFTA if elected. But they did say that Mr. Brodie had no recollection of discussing any specific candidate - either Ms. Clinton or Mr. Obama.

CTV News President Robert Hurst said he would not discuss his journalists' sources.

But others said the content of Mr. Brodie's remarks was passed on to CTV's Washington bureau and their White House correspondent set out the next day to pursue the story on Ms. Clinton's apparent hypocrisy on the North American Free Trade Agreement.]

but will it soon drop from the radar?

If this does not shine some light on the candidates,
maybe Canada can shine some light on the journalism. [the story continued]

[Although CTV correspondent Tom Clark mentioned Ms. Clinton in passing, the focus of his story was on assurances from the Obama camp.

He went to air on Feb. 27 with a report that the Democratic front-runner had given advance notice to Canadian diplomats that he was about to engage in some anti-NAFTA rhetoric, but not to take it too seriously.

The report wound up on YouTube and caused an uproar in the U.S. race - influencing the final days of the critical Ohio primary, with every indication it will also play a role in the upcoming Pennsylvania vote.]

Is this part of someones campaign or strategy?
Maybe the best we can hope is that it vets us,
even if they do not get to the bottom of it.
Of course they could sound sincere now,
but still leave someone at the bottom of it.

Canada could be shining a light on our own congress
to have the backbone to investigate our own media
and the madness of our own accountability. [more * YouTube 3-7-08 Barack Obama NAFTA Scandal: A Smear Says Canada PM 3/3]

*[3-7-08] I did not post an original YouTube that depicted CBC in this or others that ran on from it.

[3-6-08: see bottom link and is someone vetting us? and should the FEC or the FCC or both investigate YouTube? For it can spread without linking or correcting, oh what a web they weave and just who do they really peeve?]

[3-8-08 Label: NAFTAgate added]
[3-9-08: UPDATE see bottom link there ]

Charlotte's Web

Share 'n Angle*

* montage of sorts [FP1]

Inconvenient Jobs Conflict?

Breaking news! or Fixed News?

President Obama requests a joint session of congress to present his jobs plan, the same night as the next[**] Rebublican debate.

Is the timing problematic?[*]

Footnotes:
Committee for Responsible Federal Budget
New America Foundation
Chuck Todd : Andrea Mitchell

MSNBC
Digital Danger!

[*] 9-1-11 See "more".
[Also note links(4) added to first 3 footnotes]
[Oh what a web, some weave or un-weave.]

[**] "first" corrected: "next"

Nebulous links!

Oh what a web... H.R. 1955 Stalled in Senate
Former Prosecutors Challenge White House Immunity Claim
_____________________________________________________________________

Maybe Michelle Malkin does "deserve a break today"*,
but "What Happened" by Scott McClellan
does not. Neither does the subtitle:
Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception

Maybe the Boston Globe has taken the Keffiyeh Kerfuffle(which I did not know was a title to one of her pieces) too seriously. But that does not mean they deserve a bad wrap.(poor pun) Having found a bit more on the story I will link here and here for later. (But I may not return as I believe the later touches my point on marketing, and what may be viral.**)

* I have no stock in Mc(anything), actually some stock, but not in McSame, or fear of change or a bad wrap.

** what ties this in, apparently fear of wraps, and keeping things under your kerfluffle.

[6-3-08: Hard Core Link? Blowing Bubble? ]

In "F"n able?

[FOOTNOTE PAGE FOR NOVEMBER 2012]
Posted Tuesday 11-6-12 as Time Stamped.
Most recent at top.

11-30  (fn) this under construction.

11-23-12  Cautious Black Friday!!!! 
Strunk - http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html
(b.s. )^ Charotte + Web
FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012
Give us a brake?
^ note yesterday's below correction (b.S.)= spots in this blogSpot

11-22-12 Happy Thanksgiving!!!!!!!
As for footnotes, all are b.S.(blog Spots) in order:
Transition - Nail Meet F--C---[!]
of* - Post Election
Sorts - Hump Day for Journalism
* - FC "Hammer"
anachronistic - Middle C?
caution - Local Journalism
C-VC(viscous^ cycle of sorts)
^(also 11-23-12) re:correction (these 2) are b.s.(blog searches)

11-10-12 That is the ticket![!] 6 S I G M A (OW!)

11-9-12 Stop that! Oh when the Saints...GM'nI(Annie Oakley?WarBucks)
M - F: (a ... o h ?)  [Bracket-EDS:  U-Tubes ( a, b, c, d ) Speaking of ana chonisms(sic).]

11-6-12 Hump Day for Journalism  I should have journaled links as inserted but here goes...not [!]^
^ paradox? (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i ?)
c c? In F able? e, f, ironic? (i.e. Q u b4^^ a,b, ... ?)
^^ Aftermath (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m )
For Achronism Sake. (Earlier post moved (and edited)to above the fold.)
[Not to bury the lede: R S N ? (spell check done [!])]
Update: Footnotes & here. (not)

11-6-12 Post Election
11-7-12 Pre-math?^  P.M. (not to pun on After Math, but Pincer Movement)
b.s.= blog search
? = b.s.(almond+joy)
day = facebook AM1090 Norman Goldman 88 Keys!
of = ** see "?"
spirit = Infamy?  Not EXACTLY[!]^^
the = b.s.(danger+field)
in = the P.I. Given 2nd term, Obama now facing new urgent task
[and this is only the f'n asterisks]
^after thought (NFRY)
^^ scroll over

i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy

[Post dated 7-12-12]
[7-19-12 Anachronistic Caution * ! ]

Tetra Heed Run?

Speaking of Tetras, not the fish.

(Not to mention NOW, "there, there". Romney Files.)

T for Bane or, E for Cain, Tr for Issa and A for Priebus? 

i.e. Raw Money the 5th Elephant or L-lament?

Re: the Tetra Heed Ron, the I Ron Knee of the BOron or MoRon?

Ne BO*Son re:Biden

Re: Paragons v. Paragones

Re: Models v. Meta4s

(Not exactly) Re: Caricatures and Labels

Re: NOW, Fiscal Cliff predictable B.S. 

Knot? To we' ve.

Note that the third image is my original in[!]tent or rather Platonic Tetra Heed Run[!]. 

[!]= sarcasm/satire paragon/paragone thing 

The top two tetrahedron are later labeling, but may also represent a die-caught-o'me,  

PER or PRE culture/environment-al. The web is inFable!    

Owe what a web...

Elements of Style* Weaves. 

No you're audience[!]

[!]~(sic)/ sarcasm in coinage
Or We gee bored.

*Hint: E.B. White
Edit: 3-16-14 (asterisk/arrangement/labels)
(metapropism?)
(speaking of webs)

Allegory (4A)

Or gory][alley.

Subset [*]: anecdotal
anomoly? (not of the subset) Misuse of statistics or just plain not capable of using...

[Saved for Wilbur(C.Web)& from Alice** or the Tea Cup?]

[*] update 10-7-09 to McGaughey being taken to the Tool Shed and more apocrypha and astroturf

[** 10-7-09] note: this is Rep. Alan Grayson questioning the Federal Reserve Inspector General(this literary reference is to the meeting of the minds of the left and libertarian.) And here is Melanie Sloan of CREW a swifter of astroturf.]

FOOTNOTES(March 2013) Page 3

3-14-13 {?} oar? A.Conservative Foray (4A) (sc),  B. Rocket Man?[!] C. FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012 (Sp?), D. HiTetra! , E. Rest in Peace: Andrew Breitbart , F. Primary Boogeyman , G. A Shot in the Arm? , H. 4A (sc), I. The Lost Obama (sc), J. Oh, what a web... , K.Vy Not? I'll Tell You Vy! (sc),  L. Allegory (4A) (sc)

3-20-13 Pardon My Hume or Ism.  Economics is about balancing the rock, paper, scissors 4moolahs (a,b) and wack-a-mole of charts.

3-22-13 (FP2) *Ctrl F(leverage)&(b.s.): A, b, C(c), d, E, F, G(g), H(h), I(i), J(j), K.

...when first we practice...

Oh what a web?
...we weave ?
to peeve?
...when first we practice... The Real Scoop?

OH WHAT A WEB

WE UNWEAVE

In following up on the matters in the last two posts, and hearing Thom Hartmann quote Dwight Eisenhower, in just looking for a phone contact I found it.

Dwight Eisenhower was a remarkable man, and should have been listened to and still should be heard.

"Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are...a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
- President Dwight D. Eisenhower,

While still just a man and words are just words, there are dreams and there are nightmares, which should we work for? Now that is not to say that some of these noted items he would not say went too far, there are those that say they need to be reformed when really they mean to replace with privatization which really means corporatization, which is not a far cry from the military-industrial complex he also warned of...

"just supposed to 'call balls and strikes'-"

Sotomayor on the letter of the law.
A Smile to Set the GOP on Edge.
by Eugene Robinson, The Washington Post

Empathy, Sotomayor, and Democracy: The Conservative Stealth Strategy
by George Lakoff, TruthOut / Perspective

The logic of perspective and experience demonstrates the dynamics of interpretation. The framing of the question under the dynamics link almost makes moot the need to follow the arguments that supposedly "demolish" the supremacy of the courts, yet seems to demostrate the spirit of the law over the letter of the law. That being the dymamics of the power to the people and the foundations of justice in the constitution. It seems that it is only in the lack of the people to call into question a law that it not find itself before the court.
[And before one points out that there is no spirit of the law in the constitution, neither is there the word "letter" or "balls or strikes", let alone "policy" or "corporation", except in the privacy policy of the web page.] Without the spirit of the law as interpreted and argued by all three branches for the people, there is no foundation or principle let alone moral high ground for our exceptionalism.]

[6-2-09: ThinkProgress.org The Two Faces of Opposition ]

FOOTNOTE PAGE TWO APRIL 2013

4-1-13: (b.s.) Fools - Pre-post-or-us? (sc), Swift Reading!(ow) (sc), Contempt for Courage, The Bully... (sc)

4-2-13 (b.s.)of sorts[!]?  Order actually read? The Treason of the Intellectuals, by Chris Hedges, Lessons From a Comeback, by Paul Krugman, Bush’s Economic Policies Bankrupted U.S., Reagan Budget Director Says, by Tracy Bloom on (David Stockman).

4-3-13 two too dimention? (b.s.) Fear and Running, It is about time...(sc), Dimentionalism(sic) (sc), Over Helming.(sc), Place Holder? (sc) (dimensionalism M-bed?)  Note.

$-$*-13: B4 I get too E-volved, I should note a few original intents, prior(a){i}^ two the heading I settled on. ^ o w [?]
[ Re: Too Evolved ? (b.s.): A, B. Fiddle Sticks^ , C, D. Primary Boogeyman, E. We Can't Wait, F. Following results. :/: ]

*cap or shift pun disKantinued
4-9-13 ** Re:Figure The resemblance to a stop sign is subtle but more symptomatic of a go sine.
4-15-13 From Bank to Bagel there is a lot to Un-M-bed.
4-16-13 "parsing": emphasis links
4-22-13: Careful what you S.F. (i.e. search 4? )
4-23-13 : darn may be closer.
"we+weave" /  A(sc), (b)...when first we practice..., C, (d)Oh, what a web..., E (Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor?), ]+[,  F, g, h, I(sc), J, K(sc), L(sc), M, N(sc)
"delta+dawn" / A(sc), B(sc), C(sc)
4-24-13 2nd line (sc)copy paste:  Pun it?, Game+Lock, Connecting the Dots, / , /, Filibuster Bluster*.
4-25-13 Not to bury the lede or G! (nor D, E, F?)
4-30-13 Pardon the Live chronism [!]

Give us a brake?

[Originally Posted evening 8-30-12]
Raw Hide!
OK, the RNC convention is over. 
It is hard to say much about the Clint Eastwood performance. 
Was he in character, or was he just acting his age? 
It was a good performance, but the Romney camp has defended it as an ad lib.
It was a break from the rest of the speeches, except for the empty chair. 
Rachel Maddow is reporting it as wierd.  I would give it more credit.
They are saying that much will be made of the Clint Eastwood performance. 
Which will detract from the other so-called messengers of the convention.
So much of the convention were good performances, if you forget that governing does not go by a script. 

[8-31-12]
The above** might not be my usual script.  But is less or more* a Charlotte's Web.
"Move em up!" might have been its original heading, but it is lost on the edit-room floor. 
"Give us a brake?" is the pun on the break or the foot in the mouth on the brake?
The point is what is the point.  And it's politics, not its politics.***

*Mitt Flop=?[!]=meaning? Not!
**written "as is" 8-30-12[UPDATE]
*** "Stunk and White(and Angell)"[!]?

[Note the simplicity of the bottom line(see bold ** to*** of text ).  Note the elements over the style. Not exactly a pun, far from Socratic.  A bit more Platonic, less Pythagorian, not exactly by the book as for the "Elements...(or)Style". See turn around and braking script or characters. Don't scratch too deep.  Or is it scroll ?]


[Footnote: I really should brake and change gears, but here I note that I may later insert links beyond the original raw hide.  BTW:  I know the series was one word, but it is the way I literally rove and un-rove.